Cambodia vs Mali: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- Cambodia
- Mali
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 49.83 Mt CO2e against 48.01 Mt CO2e in Mali, a difference of 1.82 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 78th and Mali ranks 81st of 203 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 9.22 Mt CO2e | 9.82 Mt CO2e | 0.6006 Mt CO2e | Mali |
| 1980s | 10.67 Mt CO2e | 11.37 Mt CO2e | 0.6987 Mt CO2e | Mali |
| 1990s | 17.19 Mt CO2e | 12.91 Mt CO2e | 4.29 Mt CO2e | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 24.63 Mt CO2e | 19.78 Mt CO2e | 4.86 Mt CO2e | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 35.81 Mt CO2e | 32.61 Mt CO2e | 3.19 Mt CO2e | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 48.24 Mt CO2e | 45.33 Mt CO2e | 2.91 Mt CO2e | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Cambodia or Mali?
- Cambodia, at 49.83 Mt CO2e against 48.01 Mt CO2e in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Cambodia and Mali?
- 1.82 Mt CO2e, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Mali?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Cambodia and Mali rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- Cambodia ranks 78th and Mali ranks 81st of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).