Caribbean Small States vs Turkmenistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Caribbean Small States
51.43 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Turkmenistan
114.81 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Caribbean Small States rank
46th
Turkmenistan rank
47th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Caribbean Small States
  • Turkmenistan
255075100125197019972024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 114.81 Mt CO2e against 51.43 Mt CO2e in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 63.38 Mt CO2e.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 2.2 times Caribbean Small States's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Caribbean Small States ranks 46th and Turkmenistan ranks 47th of 47 groups.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Small States Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1970s 18.15 Mt CO2e 34.18 Mt CO2e 16.03 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
1980s 22.11 Mt CO2e 48.47 Mt CO2e 26.36 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
1990s 27.21 Mt CO2e 48.72 Mt CO2e 21.51 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
2000s 46.43 Mt CO2e 77.78 Mt CO2e 31.35 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
2010s 55.57 Mt CO2e 100.18 Mt CO2e 44.61 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
2020s 51.36 Mt CO2e 123.25 Mt CO2e 71.88 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Caribbean Small States or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 114.81 Mt CO2e against 51.43 Mt CO2e in Caribbean Small States as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Caribbean Small States and Turkmenistan?
63.38 Mt CO2e, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Turkmenistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Caribbean Small States and Turkmenistan rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Caribbean Small States ranks 46th and Turkmenistan ranks 47th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean Small States vs Turkmenistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/caribbean-small-states/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/caribbean-small-states/turkmenistan/">Caribbean Small States vs Turkmenistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).