Central African Republic vs Namibia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Central African Republic
13.44 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Namibia
14.21 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
133rd
Namibia rank
130th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Namibia
051015197019972024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 14.21 Mt CO2e against 13.44 Mt CO2e in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.77 Mt CO2e.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 130th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.04 Mt CO2e 6.46 Mt CO2e 4.41 Mt CO2e Namibia
1980s 6.04 Mt CO2e 6.08 Mt CO2e 0.0393 Mt CO2e Namibia
1990s 8.26 Mt CO2e 7 Mt CO2e 1.26 Mt CO2e Central African Republic
2000s 9.76 Mt CO2e 9.32 Mt CO2e 0.4473 Mt CO2e Central African Republic
2010s 11.87 Mt CO2e 11.02 Mt CO2e 0.8572 Mt CO2e Central African Republic
2020s 12.93 Mt CO2e 12.73 Mt CO2e 0.206 Mt CO2e Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Central African Republic or Namibia?
Namibia, at 14.21 Mt CO2e against 13.44 Mt CO2e in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Central African Republic and Namibia?
0.77 Mt CO2e, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Namibia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Namibia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Central African Republic ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 130th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Namibia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/central-african-republic/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/central-african-republic/namibia/">Central African Republic vs Namibia: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).