Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Chad
101.17 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
102.53 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Chad rank
55th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
53rd

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Chad
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020406080100197019972024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 102.53 Mt CO2e against 101.17 Mt CO2e in Chad, a difference of 1.36 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Chad ranks 55th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 53rd of 203 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 8.35 Mt CO2e 20.81 Mt CO2e 12.46 Mt CO2e Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 9.16 Mt CO2e 27.05 Mt CO2e 17.88 Mt CO2e Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 20.31 Mt CO2e 32.51 Mt CO2e 12.21 Mt CO2e Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 35.11 Mt CO2e 45.02 Mt CO2e 9.91 Mt CO2e Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 61.12 Mt CO2e 67.36 Mt CO2e 6.24 Mt CO2e Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 91.63 Mt CO2e 91.75 Mt CO2e 0.121 Mt CO2e Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Chad or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 102.53 Mt CO2e against 101.17 Mt CO2e in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.36 Mt CO2e, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Chad ranks 55th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 53rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/chad/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/chad/tanzania/">Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).