Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Norway: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
58.49 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Norway
53.76 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
71st
Norway rank
74th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Norway
0204060197019972024

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 58.49 Mt CO2e against 53.76 Mt CO2e in Norway, a difference of 4.73 Mt CO2e.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 71st and Norway ranks 74th of 203 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 12.44 Mt CO2e 57.88 Mt CO2e 45.44 Mt CO2e Norway
1980s 22.8 Mt CO2e 55.76 Mt CO2e 32.96 Mt CO2e Norway
1990s 24.21 Mt CO2e 56.48 Mt CO2e 32.27 Mt CO2e Norway
2000s 25.78 Mt CO2e 60.24 Mt CO2e 34.46 Mt CO2e Norway
2010s 39.63 Mt CO2e 61.85 Mt CO2e 22.22 Mt CO2e Norway
2020s 54.83 Mt CO2e 56.68 Mt CO2e 1.86 Mt CO2e Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Norway?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 58.49 Mt CO2e against 53.76 Mt CO2e in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Norway?
4.73 Mt CO2e, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Norway?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Norway rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 71st and Norway ranks 74th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Norway: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/congo-dem-rep/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/congo-dem-rep/norway/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Norway: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).