Cuba vs Madagascar: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- Cuba
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 35.99 Mt CO2e against 35.79 Mt CO2e in Madagascar, a difference of 0.2 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 99th and Madagascar ranks 100th of 203 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 45.58 Mt CO2e | 18.83 Mt CO2e | 26.75 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1980s | 57.22 Mt CO2e | 21.99 Mt CO2e | 35.24 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1990s | 45.33 Mt CO2e | 23.94 Mt CO2e | 21.38 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2000s | 43.22 Mt CO2e | 25.27 Mt CO2e | 17.95 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | 44.04 Mt CO2e | 30.65 Mt CO2e | 13.39 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2020s | 35.66 Mt CO2e | 34.28 Mt CO2e | 1.38 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Cuba or Madagascar?
- Cuba, at 35.99 Mt CO2e against 35.79 Mt CO2e in Madagascar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Cuba and Madagascar?
- 0.2 Mt CO2e, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Madagascar?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Madagascar rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- Cuba ranks 99th and Madagascar ranks 100th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).