Dominica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Dominica
0.1524 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2378 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Dominica rank
192nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
189th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Dominica
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.150.20.25197019972024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.2378 Mt CO2e against 0.1524 Mt CO2e in Dominica, a difference of 0.0854 Mt CO2e.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.6 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 192nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 189th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.04 Mt CO2e 0.0055 Mt CO2e 0.0345 Mt CO2e Dominica
1980s 0.0614 Mt CO2e 0.0071 Mt CO2e 0.0542 Mt CO2e Dominica
1990s 0.1024 Mt CO2e 0.0108 Mt CO2e 0.0916 Mt CO2e Dominica
2000s 0.1228 Mt CO2e 0.0459 Mt CO2e 0.0768 Mt CO2e Dominica
2010s 0.1354 Mt CO2e 0.1109 Mt CO2e 0.0245 Mt CO2e Dominica
2020s 0.1477 Mt CO2e 0.2293 Mt CO2e 0.0816 Mt CO2e Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Dominica or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.2378 Mt CO2e against 0.1524 Mt CO2e in Dominica as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Dominica and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0854 Mt CO2e, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Turks and Caicos Islands?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Dominica and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Dominica ranks 192nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 189th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/dominica/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/dominica/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Dominica vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).