Georgia vs Malawi: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time
- Georgia
- Malawi
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 19.6 Mt CO2e against 19.02 Mt CO2e in Malawi, a difference of 0.58 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 120th and Malawi ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 34.37 Mt CO2e | 2.7 Mt CO2e | 31.68 Mt CO2e | Georgia |
| 1980s | 39.07 Mt CO2e | 3.63 Mt CO2e | 35.43 Mt CO2e | Georgia |
| 1990s | 19.9 Mt CO2e | 6.53 Mt CO2e | 13.37 Mt CO2e | Georgia |
| 2000s | 11.15 Mt CO2e | 9.06 Mt CO2e | 2.09 Mt CO2e | Georgia |
| 2010s | 15.92 Mt CO2e | 14.13 Mt CO2e | 1.79 Mt CO2e | Georgia |
| 2020s | 19.01 Mt CO2e | 18.46 Mt CO2e | 0.5489 Mt CO2e | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Georgia or Malawi?
- Georgia, at 19.6 Mt CO2e against 19.02 Mt CO2e in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Georgia and Malawi?
- 0.58 Mt CO2e, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
- Georgia ranks 120th and Malawi ranks 123rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).