Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Kiribati
0.1152 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.1855 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Kiribati rank
193rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
190th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.050.10.150.2197019972024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.1855 Mt CO2e against 0.1152 Mt CO2e in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0703 Mt CO2e.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.6 times Kiribati's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 193rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 190th of 203 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0347 Mt CO2e 0.0633 Mt CO2e 0.0286 Mt CO2e Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0343 Mt CO2e 0.0627 Mt CO2e 0.0284 Mt CO2e Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0356 Mt CO2e 0.0753 Mt CO2e 0.0397 Mt CO2e Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0736 Mt CO2e 0.1116 Mt CO2e 0.038 Mt CO2e Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0927 Mt CO2e 0.1403 Mt CO2e 0.0476 Mt CO2e Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.1111 Mt CO2e 0.1745 Mt CO2e 0.0634 Mt CO2e Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Kiribati or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.1855 Mt CO2e against 0.1152 Mt CO2e in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0703 Mt CO2e, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Kiribati ranks 193rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 190th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/kiribati/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/kiribati/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Kiribati vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).