Mongolia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Mongolia
104.36 Mt CO2e
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
102.53 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Mongolia rank
51st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
54th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Mongolia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
20406080100197019972024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 104.36 Mt CO2e against 102.53 Mt CO2e in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.83 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 51st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 54th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 21.68 Mt CO2e 20.81 Mt CO2e 0.8646 Mt CO2e Mongolia
1980s 27.37 Mt CO2e 27.05 Mt CO2e 0.3203 Mt CO2e Mongolia
1990s 28.88 Mt CO2e 32.51 Mt CO2e 3.63 Mt CO2e United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 30.13 Mt CO2e 45.02 Mt CO2e 14.88 Mt CO2e United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 57.52 Mt CO2e 67.36 Mt CO2e 9.84 Mt CO2e United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 82.7 Mt CO2e 91.75 Mt CO2e 9.05 Mt CO2e United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Mongolia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Mongolia, at 104.36 Mt CO2e against 102.53 Mt CO2e in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Mongolia and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.83 Mt CO2e, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United Republic of Tanzania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Mongolia ranks 51st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 54th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/mongolia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/mongolia/tanzania/">Mongolia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).