Pacific island small states vs Turkmenistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF

Pacific island small states
6.54 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Turkmenistan
114.81 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Pacific island small states rank
47th
Turkmenistan rank
47th

Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF over time

  • Pacific island small states
  • Turkmenistan
050100150197019972024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 114.81 Mt CO2e against 6.54 Mt CO2e in Pacific island small states, a difference of 108.27 Mt CO2e.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 17.6 times Pacific island small states's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Pacific island small states ranks 47th and Turkmenistan ranks 47th of 47 groups.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pacific island small states Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1970s 4.71 Mt CO2e 34.18 Mt CO2e 29.47 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
1980s 5.3 Mt CO2e 48.47 Mt CO2e 43.17 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
1990s 6.3 Mt CO2e 48.72 Mt CO2e 42.42 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
2000s 6.56 Mt CO2e 77.78 Mt CO2e 71.22 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
2010s 6.58 Mt CO2e 100.18 Mt CO2e 93.6 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan
2020s 6.15 Mt CO2e 123.25 Mt CO2e 117.1 Mt CO2e Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf, Pacific island small states or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 114.81 Mt CO2e against 6.54 Mt CO2e in Pacific island small states as of 2024.
What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf between Pacific island small states and Turkmenistan?
108.27 Mt CO2e, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific island small states and Turkmenistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Pacific island small states and Turkmenistan rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions excluding lulucf?
Pacific island small states ranks 47th and Turkmenistan ranks 47th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pacific island small states vs Turkmenistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/pacific-island-small-states/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e/pacific-island-small-states/turkmenistan/">Pacific island small states vs Turkmenistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphurhexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, and agriculture sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).