Argentina vs Kazakhstan: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Argentina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 424.71 Mt CO2e against 330.81 Mt CO2e in Kazakhstan, a difference of 93.9 Mt CO2e.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 415.62 Mt CO2e | 273.46 Mt CO2e | 142.16 Mt CO2e | Argentina |
| 2010s | 411.14 Mt CO2e | 318.56 Mt CO2e | 92.58 Mt CO2e | Argentina |
| 2020s | 425.11 Mt CO2e | 322.56 Mt CO2e | 102.56 Mt CO2e | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Argentina or Kazakhstan?
- Argentina, at 424.71 Mt CO2e against 330.81 Mt CO2e in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 93.9 Mt CO2e, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Kazakhstan rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Argentina ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).