Botswana vs North Macedonia: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Botswana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 9.79 Mt CO2e against 9.21 Mt CO2e in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.58 Mt CO2e.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Botswana ranks 125th and North Macedonia ranks 126th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.34 Mt CO2e | 10.47 Mt CO2e | 3.12 Mt CO2e | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 9.29 Mt CO2e | 9.28 Mt CO2e | 0.0155 Mt CO2e | Botswana |
| 2020s | 9.27 Mt CO2e | 9.08 Mt CO2e | 0.1865 Mt CO2e | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Botswana or North Macedonia?
- Botswana, at 9.79 Mt CO2e against 9.21 Mt CO2e in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 0.58 Mt CO2e, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Botswana ranks 125th and North Macedonia ranks 126th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).