China vs IDA & IBRD total: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- China
- IDA & IBRD total
How they compare
IDA & IBRD total currently reports 32,830 Mt CO2e against 14,065 Mt CO2e in China, a difference of 18,765 Mt CO2e.
That makes IDA & IBRD total's figure about 2.3 times China's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, IDA & IBRD total has been ahead every year.
China ranks 1st and IDA & IBRD total ranks 2nd of 176 countries.
IDA & IBRD total has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | IDA & IBRD total | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,750 Mt CO2e | 20,391 Mt CO2e | 13,642 Mt CO2e | IDA & IBRD total |
| 2010s | 11,721 Mt CO2e | 28,295 Mt CO2e | 16,575 Mt CO2e | IDA & IBRD total |
| 2020s | 13,496 Mt CO2e | 31,606 Mt CO2e | 18,110 Mt CO2e | IDA & IBRD total |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, China or IDA & IBRD total?
- IDA & IBRD total, at 32,830 Mt CO2e against 14,065 Mt CO2e in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between China and IDA & IBRD total?
- 18,765 Mt CO2e, with IDA & IBRD total ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and IDA & IBRD total?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do China and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- China ranks 1st and IDA & IBRD total ranks 2nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).