Comoros vs Eswatini: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Comoros
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -0.7113 Mt CO2e against -1.2 Mt CO2e in Comoros, a difference of 0.4887 Mt CO2e.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 157th and Eswatini ranks 156th of 176 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.74 Mt CO2e | -0.5291 Mt CO2e | 1.21 Mt CO2e | Eswatini |
| 2010s | -1.37 Mt CO2e | -0.7757 Mt CO2e | 0.5908 Mt CO2e | Eswatini |
| 2020s | -1.31 Mt CO2e | -0.6995 Mt CO2e | 0.6111 Mt CO2e | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Comoros or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at -0.7113 Mt CO2e against -1.2 Mt CO2e in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Comoros and Eswatini?
- 0.4887 Mt CO2e, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Eswatini rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Comoros ranks 157th and Eswatini ranks 156th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).