Comoros vs Tonga: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Comoros
- Tonga
How they compare
Comoros currently reports -1.2 Mt CO2e against -1.71 Mt CO2e in Tonga, a difference of 0.51 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tonga ahead.
Comoros ranks 157th and Tonga ranks 158th of 176 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.74 Mt CO2e | -1.76 Mt CO2e | 0.0156 Mt CO2e | Comoros |
| 2010s | -1.37 Mt CO2e | -1.75 Mt CO2e | 0.3799 Mt CO2e | Comoros |
| 2020s | -1.31 Mt CO2e | -1.7 Mt CO2e | 0.3852 Mt CO2e | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Comoros or Tonga?
- Comoros, at -1.2 Mt CO2e against -1.71 Mt CO2e in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Comoros and Tonga?
- 0.51 Mt CO2e, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Tonga rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Comoros ranks 157th and Tonga ranks 158th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).