Congo vs Eritrea: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 6.33 Mt CO2e against 6.17 Mt CO2e in Congo, a difference of 0.16 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 134th and Eritrea ranks 133rd of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.49 Mt CO2e | 5.21 Mt CO2e | 3.72 Mt CO2e | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -3.16 Mt CO2e | 5.77 Mt CO2e | 8.92 Mt CO2e | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 6.81 Mt CO2e | 6.22 Mt CO2e | 0.5873 Mt CO2e | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Congo or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 6.33 Mt CO2e against 6.17 Mt CO2e in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Congo and Eritrea?
- 0.16 Mt CO2e, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Congo ranks 134th and Eritrea ranks 133rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).