Cuba vs Eritrea: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Cuba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 7.33 Mt CO2e against 6.33 Mt CO2e in Eritrea, a difference of 1 Mt CO2e.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 131st and Eritrea ranks 133rd of 176 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.53 Mt CO2e | 5.21 Mt CO2e | 18.33 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | 18.33 Mt CO2e | 5.77 Mt CO2e | 12.56 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2020s | 7.46 Mt CO2e | 6.22 Mt CO2e | 1.24 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Cuba or Eritrea?
- Cuba, at 7.33 Mt CO2e against 6.33 Mt CO2e in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Cuba and Eritrea?
- 1 Mt CO2e, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eritrea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Eritrea rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Cuba ranks 131st and Eritrea ranks 133rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).