Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 16.77 Mt CO2e against 16.53 Mt CO2e in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.24 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 108th and Estonia ranks 106th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.13 Mt CO2e | 20.12 Mt CO2e | 3.02 Mt CO2e | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 21.84 Mt CO2e | 25.86 Mt CO2e | 4.02 Mt CO2e | Estonia |
| 2020s | 17.59 Mt CO2e | 17.35 Mt CO2e | 0.2459 Mt CO2e | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Equatorial Guinea or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 16.77 Mt CO2e against 16.53 Mt CO2e in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?
- 0.24 Mt CO2e, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Estonia rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 108th and Estonia ranks 106th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).