Equatorial Guinea vs Lithuania: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 16.53 Mt CO2e against 15.85 Mt CO2e in Lithuania, a difference of 0.68 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 108th and Lithuania ranks 111th of 176 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.13 Mt CO2e | 16.06 Mt CO2e | 7.07 Mt CO2e | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 21.84 Mt CO2e | 16.22 Mt CO2e | 5.61 Mt CO2e | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 17.59 Mt CO2e | 17.27 Mt CO2e | 0.3249 Mt CO2e | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Equatorial Guinea or Lithuania?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 16.53 Mt CO2e against 15.85 Mt CO2e in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Equatorial Guinea and Lithuania?
- 0.68 Mt CO2e, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lithuania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Lithuania rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 108th and Lithuania ranks 111th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).