Eswatini vs Samoa: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Eswatini
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports -0.2602 Mt CO2e against -0.7113 Mt CO2e in Eswatini, a difference of 0.4511 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 156th and Samoa ranks 153rd of 176 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5291 Mt CO2e | -0.4673 Mt CO2e | 0.0618 Mt CO2e | Samoa |
| 2010s | -0.7757 Mt CO2e | -0.2387 Mt CO2e | 0.537 Mt CO2e | Samoa |
| 2020s | -0.6995 Mt CO2e | -0.3249 Mt CO2e | 0.3747 Mt CO2e | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Eswatini or Samoa?
- Samoa, at -0.2602 Mt CO2e against -0.7113 Mt CO2e in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Eswatini and Samoa?
- 0.4511 Mt CO2e, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Samoa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Samoa rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Eswatini ranks 156th and Samoa ranks 153rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).