Jordan vs Nicaragua: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Jordan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 33.48 Mt CO2e against 31.68 Mt CO2e in Nicaragua, a difference of 1.8 Mt CO2e.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Jordan ranks 91st and Nicaragua ranks 93rd of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.44 Mt CO2e | 24.52 Mt CO2e | 2.08 Mt CO2e | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 30.28 Mt CO2e | 29.09 Mt CO2e | 1.2 Mt CO2e | Jordan |
| 2020s | 31.34 Mt CO2e | 31.2 Mt CO2e | 0.1354 Mt CO2e | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Jordan or Nicaragua?
- Jordan, at 33.48 Mt CO2e against 31.68 Mt CO2e in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Jordan and Nicaragua?
- 1.8 Mt CO2e, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Nicaragua?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Nicaragua rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Jordan ranks 91st and Nicaragua ranks 93rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).