Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Jordan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 33.48 Mt CO2e against 31.48 Mt CO2e in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 2 Mt CO2e.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Jordan ranks 91st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.44 Mt CO2e | 34.58 Mt CO2e | 12.14 Mt CO2e | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 30.28 Mt CO2e | 40.89 Mt CO2e | 10.61 Mt CO2e | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 31.34 Mt CO2e | 32.98 Mt CO2e | 1.64 Mt CO2e | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Jordan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Jordan, at 33.48 Mt CO2e against 31.48 Mt CO2e in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2 Mt CO2e, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Jordan ranks 91st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 94th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).