Kuwait vs Uzbekistan: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Kuwait
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 202.91 Mt CO2e against 168.02 Mt CO2e in Kuwait, a difference of 34.89 Mt CO2e.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Kuwait's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 37th and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 176 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.14 Mt CO2e | 176.57 Mt CO2e | 65.43 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 142.13 Mt CO2e | 184 Mt CO2e | 41.88 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 156.12 Mt CO2e | 200.62 Mt CO2e | 44.5 Mt CO2e | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Kuwait or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 202.91 Mt CO2e against 168.02 Mt CO2e in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Kuwait and Uzbekistan?
- 34.89 Mt CO2e, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Uzbekistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Uzbekistan rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Kuwait ranks 37th and Uzbekistan ranks 34th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).