Mozambique vs Singapore: Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF
Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF over time
- Mozambique
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 72.42 Mt CO2e against 68.04 Mt CO2e in Mozambique, a difference of 4.38 Mt CO2e.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Singapore ahead.
Mozambique ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 60th of 176 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.97 Mt CO2e | 52.3 Mt CO2e | 26.33 Mt CO2e | Singapore |
| 2010s | 60.4 Mt CO2e | 63.83 Mt CO2e | 3.43 Mt CO2e | Singapore |
| 2020s | 65.99 Mt CO2e | 70.78 Mt CO2e | 4.79 Mt CO2e | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf, Mozambique or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 72.42 Mt CO2e against 68.04 Mt CO2e in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf between Mozambique and Singapore?
- 4.38 Mt CO2e, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Singapore?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Singapore rank globally for total greenhouse gas emissions including lulucf?
- Mozambique ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 60th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, published as Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of the six greenhouse gases (GHG) covered by the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)) from the energy, industry, waste, agriculture, and land use, land use changes, and forestry (LULUCF) sectors, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).