Australia vs New Zealand: Total oda for biodiversity by donor
Australia
100.65 million
in 2023
New Zealand
100.27 million
in 2023
Australia rank
15th
New Zealand rank
16th
Total oda for biodiversity by donor over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Australia currently reports 100.65 million against 100.27 million in New Zealand, a difference of 380,000.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 30 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.15 million | 9.16 million | 52.99 million | Australia |
| 2010s | 281.11 million | 15.60 million | 265.51 million | Australia |
| 2020s | 137.09 million | 43.38 million | 93.71 million | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total oda for biodiversity by donor, Australia or New Zealand?
- Australia, at 100.65 million against 100.27 million in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total oda for biodiversity by donor between Australia and New Zealand?
- 380,000, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for total oda for biodiversity by donor?
- Australia ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Total oda for biodiversity by donor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.