Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
1,427 million constant US$
in 2024
Mexico
307.96 million constant US$
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
9th
Mexico rank
5th

Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient over time

  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
  • Mexico
05001.0k1.5k200220132024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1,427 million constant US$ against 307.96 million constant US$ in Mexico, a difference of 1,119 million constant US$.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.6 times Mexico's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 5th of 55 regions.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 367.76 million constant US$ 14.21 million constant US$ 353.55 million constant US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1,084 million constant US$ 70.52 million constant US$ 1,013 million constant US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1,176 million constant US$ 212.01 million constant US$ 963.75 million constant US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Mexico?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 1,427 million constant US$ against 307.96 million constant US$ in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
1,119 million constant US$, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Mexico rank globally for total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 5th of 55 regions.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-official-development-assistance-for-biodiversity-by-recipient-countries-millions-of/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/total-official-development-assistance-for-biodiversity-by-recipient-countries-millions-of/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/">Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)
Unit
million constant US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
184 places, 3,908 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed