Australia and New Zealand vs Peru: Tree-covered areas — Area from CCI_LC

Australia and New Zealand
84,171 1000 ha
in 2022
Peru
81,843 1000 ha
in 2022
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Peru rank
8th

Tree-covered areas — Area from CCI_LC over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Peru
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199220072022

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 84,171 1000 ha against 81,843 1000 ha in Peru, a difference of 2,328 1000 ha.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Peru ranks 8th of 224 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 84,319 1000 ha 82,223 1000 ha 2,096 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 83,463 1000 ha 81,604 1000 ha 1,860 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 83,322 1000 ha 81,509 1000 ha 1,812 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 84,190 1000 ha 81,814 1000 ha 2,376 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree-covered areas — area from cci_lc, Australia and New Zealand or Peru?
Australia and New Zealand, at 84,171 1000 ha against 81,843 1000 ha in Peru as of 2022.
What is the difference in tree-covered areas — area from cci_lc between Australia and New Zealand and Peru?
2,328 1000 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Peru?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Peru rank globally for tree-covered areas — area from cci_lc?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Peru ranks 8th of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tree-covered areas — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Peru: Tree-covered areas — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/tree-covered-areas-area-from-cci-lc/australia-and-new-zealand/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/tree-covered-areas-area-from-cci-lc/australia-and-new-zealand/peru/">Australia and New Zealand vs Peru: Tree-covered areas — Area from CCI_LC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree-covered areas — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.