Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Turkeys — Losses from manure treated

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
13,280 kg
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro
3,214 kg
in 2005
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
14th

Turkeys — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Serbia and Montenegro
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 13,280 kg against 3,214 kg in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 10,066 kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 14th of 30 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 12,090 kg 2,939 kg 9,151 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 7,590 kg 3,099 kg 4,490 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — losses from manure treated, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Serbia and Montenegro?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 13,280 kg against 3,214 kg in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — losses from manure treated between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro?
10,066 kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for turkeys — losses from manure treated?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 14th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Turkeys — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/serbia-and-montenegro/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Serbia and Montenegro: Turkeys — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).