Myanmar vs Uruguay: Turkeys — Losses from manure treated
Turkeys — Losses from manure treated over time
- Myanmar
- Uruguay
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 42.43 kg against 0 kg in Uruguay, a difference of 42.43 kg.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 38th and Uruguay ranks 41st of 93 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37.71 kg | 0 kg | 37.71 kg | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 43.84 kg | 0 kg | 43.84 kg | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 60.81 kg | 0 kg | 60.81 kg | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 56.57 kg | 0 kg | 56.57 kg | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher turkeys — losses from manure treated, Myanmar or Uruguay?
- Myanmar, at 42.43 kg against 0 kg in Uruguay as of 2011.
- What is the difference in turkeys — losses from manure treated between Myanmar and Uruguay?
- 42.43 kg, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uruguay?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
- How do Myanmar and Uruguay rank globally for turkeys — losses from manure treated?
- Myanmar ranks 38th and Uruguay ranks 41st of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).