Argentina vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils

Argentina
3.04 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.14 million kg
in 2023
Argentina rank
20th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Argentina
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 3.04 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 897,000 kg.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 20th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st of 88 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 842,751 kg 533,068 kg 309,683 kg Argentina
1970s 1.08 million kg 770,976 kg 308,146 kg Argentina
1980s 2.98 million kg 772,142 kg 2.21 million kg Argentina
1990s 3.31 million kg 1.57 million kg 1.74 million kg Argentina
2000s 3.08 million kg 1.65 million kg 1.43 million kg Argentina
2010s 3.18 million kg 1.95 million kg 1.23 million kg Argentina
2020s 3.05 million kg 2.11 million kg 935,992 kg Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils, Argentina or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Argentina, at 3.04 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils between Argentina and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
897,000 kg, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils?
Argentina ranks 20th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/argentina/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/argentina/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Argentina vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).