Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils

Australia and New Zealand
1.75 million kg
in 2023
Belarus
2.55 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
Belarus rank
22nd

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belarus
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2.55 million kg against 1.75 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 794,350 kg.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Belarus ranks 22nd of 88 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 2.19 million kg 2.33 million kg 138,512 kg Belarus
2000s 2.02 million kg 1.52 million kg 495,751 kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 2.28 million kg 2.56 million kg 279,321 kg Belarus
2020s 1.94 million kg 2.62 million kg 681,832 kg Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
Belarus, at 2.55 million kg against 1.75 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
794,350 kg, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Belarus ranks 22nd of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).