Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils

Belarus
2.55 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.14 million kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
22nd
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2.55 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 404,480 kg.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 22nd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st of 88 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 2.33 million kg 1.76 million kg 567,849 kg Belarus
2000s 1.52 million kg 1.65 million kg 127,811 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2.56 million kg 1.95 million kg 602,873 kg Belarus
2020s 2.62 million kg 2.11 million kg 508,700 kg Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Belarus, at 2.55 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
404,480 kg, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils?
Belarus ranks 22nd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).