Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Romania: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.14 million kg
in 2023
Romania
3.05 million kg
in 2020
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st
Romania rank
19th

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Romania
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 3.05 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 908,150 kg.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Romania ranks 19th of 30 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 533,068 kg 1.58 million kg 1.05 million kg Romania
1970s 770,976 kg 2.87 million kg 2.10 million kg Romania
1980s 772,142 kg 2.25 million kg 1.48 million kg Romania
1990s 1.57 million kg 1.65 million kg 76,938 kg Romania
2000s 1.65 million kg 1.70 million kg 48,747 kg Romania
2010s 1.94 million kg 1.82 million kg 118,164 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2.08 million kg 3.05 million kg 966,220 kg Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Romania?
Romania, at 3.05 million kg against 2.14 million kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2020.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Romania?
908,150 kg, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Romania?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2020.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Romania rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Romania ranks 19th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Romania: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/romania/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Romania: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).