Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Belarus
763,692 kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
642,349 kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
22nd
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 763,692 kg against 642,349 kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 121,343 kg.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 22nd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st of 88 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 697,755 kg 527,400 kg 170,356 kg Belarus
2000s 455,978 kg 494,321 kg 38,343 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 766,801 kg 585,938 kg 180,863 kg Belarus
2020s 786,057 kg 633,448 kg 152,609 kg Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils that leaches, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Belarus, at 763,692 kg against 642,349 kg in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils that leaches between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
121,343 kg, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Belarus ranks 22nd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).