Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Australia and New Zealand
350,259 kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
222,084 kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
25th

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 350,259 kg against 222,084 kg in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 128,175 kg.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 88 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 108,558 kg 60,038 kg 48,519 kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 198,504 kg 101,906 kg 96,598 kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 336,327 kg 103,853 kg 232,473 kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 451,916 kg 151,941 kg 299,974 kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 403,136 kg 192,240 kg 210,896 kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 455,336 kg 208,042 kg 247,295 kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 387,672 kg 221,718 kg 165,954 kg Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Australia and New Zealand or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Australia and New Zealand, at 350,259 kg against 222,084 kg in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
128,175 kg, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).