Cyprus vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Cyprus
1,065 kg
in 2020
Zimbabwe
2,164 kg
in 2023
Cyprus rank
79th
Zimbabwe rank
77th

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Cyprus
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2,164 kg against 1,065 kg in Cyprus, a difference of 1,099 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.0 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 88 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 7,978 kg 938.34 kg 7,039 kg Cyprus
1970s 3,196 kg 732.84 kg 2,463 kg Cyprus
1980s 4,208 kg 621.17 kg 3,587 kg Cyprus
1990s 10,227 kg 1,270 kg 8,956 kg Cyprus
2000s 6,498 kg 1,703 kg 4,795 kg Cyprus
2010s 3,023 kg 1,980 kg 1,042 kg Cyprus
2020s 1,065 kg 2,164 kg 1,098 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Cyprus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2,164 kg against 1,065 kg in Cyprus as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Cyprus and Zimbabwe?
1,099 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2020.
How do Cyprus and Zimbabwe rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Cyprus ranks 79th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cyprus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/cyprus/zimbabwe/">Cyprus vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).