Panama vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Panama
3,622 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2,164 kg
in 2023
Panama rank
74th
Zimbabwe rank
77th

Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 3,622 kg against 2,164 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,458 kg.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.7 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Panama ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 88 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6,250 kg 938.34 kg 5,311 kg Panama
1970s 4,751 kg 732.84 kg 4,018 kg Panama
1980s 4,197 kg 621.17 kg 3,576 kg Panama
1990s 5,028 kg 1,270 kg 3,758 kg Panama
2000s 4,815 kg 1,703 kg 3,112 kg Panama
2010s 3,878 kg 2,003 kg 1,875 kg Panama
2020s 3,675 kg 2,146 kg 1,529 kg Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Panama, at 3,622 kg against 2,164 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Panama and Zimbabwe?
1,458 kg, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for turkeys — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Panama ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).