Australia vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure left on pasture

Australia
50,141 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
46,119 kg
in 2023
Australia rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
47th

Turkeys — Manure left on pasture over time

  • Australia
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 50,141 kg against 46,119 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4,022 kg.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Australia ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 93 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 12,551 kg 20,001 kg 7,451 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 25,726 kg 15,621 kg 10,105 kg Australia
1980s 47,783 kg 13,241 kg 34,542 kg Australia
1990s 65,828 kg 27,076 kg 38,752 kg Australia
2000s 58,329 kg 36,300 kg 22,029 kg Australia
2010s 66,236 kg 42,697 kg 23,539 kg Australia
2020s 55,886 kg 45,747 kg 10,138 kg Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure left on pasture, Australia or Zimbabwe?
Australia, at 50,141 kg against 46,119 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure left on pasture between Australia and Zimbabwe?
4,022 kg, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for turkeys — manure left on pasture?
Australia ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 93 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/australia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/australia/zimbabwe/">Australia vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).