Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Belarus
5,143 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
9,224 kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
44th

Turkeys — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 9,224 kg against 5,143 kg in Belarus, a difference of 4,081 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.8 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 88 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 4,699 kg 5,430 kg 731.46 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 3,071 kg 7,260 kg 4,189 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 5,164 kg 8,539 kg 3,376 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 5,293 kg 9,149 kg 3,856 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 9,224 kg against 5,143 kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
4,081 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for turkeys — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Belarus ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Turkeys — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).