Russian Federation vs United States of America: Turkeys — Manure management

Russian Federation
16.27 million kg
in 2023
United States of America
132.74 million kg
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
8th
United States of America rank
5th

Turkeys — Manure management over time

  • Russian Federation
  • United States of America
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 132.74 million kg against 16.27 million kg in Russian Federation, a difference of 116.46 million kg.

That makes United States of America's figure about 8.2 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 8th and United States of America ranks 5th of 88 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 5.91 million kg 175.47 million kg 169.56 million kg United States of America
2000s 4.33 million kg 159.65 million kg 155.32 million kg United States of America
2010s 9.01 million kg 146.01 million kg 137.00 million kg United States of America
2020s 15.86 million kg 131.37 million kg 115.51 million kg United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — manure management, Russian Federation or United States of America?
United States of America, at 132.74 million kg against 16.27 million kg in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — manure management between Russian Federation and United States of America?
116.46 million kg, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United States of America?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and United States of America rank globally for turkeys — manure management?
Russian Federation ranks 8th and United States of America ranks 5th of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs United States of America: Turkeys — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/russian-federation-2/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/russian-federation-2/united-states-of-america/">Russian Federation vs United States of America: Turkeys — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).