Latvia vs Myanmar: Turkeys — Stocks
Turkeys — Stocks over time
- Latvia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 7,000 An against 3,000 An in Myanmar, a difference of 4,000 An.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.3 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 84th and Myanmar ranks 86th of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,125 An | 2,250 An | 7,875 An | Latvia |
| 2000s | 11,500 An | 2,000 An | 9,500 An | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1,000 An | 3,000 An | 2,000 An | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher turkeys — stocks, Latvia or Myanmar?
- Latvia, at 7,000 An against 3,000 An in Myanmar as of 2020.
- What is the difference in turkeys — stocks between Latvia and Myanmar?
- 4,000 An, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Myanmar?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Latvia and Myanmar rank globally for turkeys — stocks?
- Latvia ranks 84th and Myanmar ranks 86th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).