Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Turkeys — Stocks

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.92 million An
in 2023
Russian Federation
8.95 million An
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th
Russian Federation rank
11th

Turkeys — Stocks over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russian Federation
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 8.95 million An against 3.92 million An in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 5.03 million An.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 30 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 2.94 million An 3.25 million An 308,875 An Russian Federation
2000s 3.13 million An 2.38 million An 752,700 An Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 3.63 million An 4.95 million An 1.33 million An Russian Federation
2020s 3.89 million An 8.72 million An 4.84 million An Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher turkeys — stocks, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 8.95 million An against 3.92 million An in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in turkeys — stocks between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
5.03 million An, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for turkeys — stocks?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Turkeys — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Turkeys — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-stocks/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/turkeys-stocks/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Turkeys — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Turkeys — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,645 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).