Anguilla vs Congo: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Anguilla
97.5%
in 2017
Congo
97.5%
in 2021
Anguilla rank
144th
Congo rank
145th
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time
- Anguilla
- Congo
How they compare
Anguilla currently reports 97.5% against 97.5% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Anguilla has been ahead every year.
Anguilla ranks 144th and Congo ranks 145th of 188 countries.
Anguilla has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Anguilla | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.6% | 95.7% | 0.9% | Anguilla |
| 2010s | 97.4% | 97.0% | 0.4% | Anguilla |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Anguilla or Congo?
- Anguilla, at 97.5% against 97.5% in Congo as of 2017.
- What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Anguilla and Congo?
- 0.0%, with Anguilla ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Anguilla and Congo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Anguilla and Congo rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
- Anguilla ranks 144th and Congo ranks 145th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.