Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Australia
100.0%
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
100.0%
in 2024
Australia rank
64th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
63rd

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Australia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 64th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 63rd of 188 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 99.9% 100.0% 0.1% Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Australia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Australia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Australia ranks 64th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/australia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/australia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Australia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.