Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Belarus
99.9%
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina
99.9%
in 2024
Belarus rank
73rd
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
72nd

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 99.9% against 99.9% in Belarus, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 73rd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 99.8% 99.6% 0.2% Belarus
2010s 99.8% 99.8% 0.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 99.9% 99.9% 0.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 99.9% against 99.9% in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Belarus ranks 73rd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.