Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Latvia: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Bosnia and Herzegovina
99.9%
in 2024
Latvia
99.9%
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
72nd
Latvia rank
75th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Latvia
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 99.9% against 99.9% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 99.6% 99.8% 0.2% Latvia
2010s 99.8% 99.8% 0.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 99.9% 99.9% 0.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Latvia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 99.9% against 99.9% in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Latvia: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/bosnia-and-herzegovina/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/bosnia-and-herzegovina/latvia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Latvia: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.