Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Burkina Faso
95.1%
in 2024
Nepal
95.0%
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
165th
Nepal rank
166th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Nepal
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 95.1% against 95.0% in Nepal, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 165th and Nepal ranks 166th of 188 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 91.3% 92.8% 1.5% Nepal
2010s 93.3% 93.9% 0.7% Nepal
2020s 94.8% 94.8% 0.0% Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Burkina Faso or Nepal?
Burkina Faso, at 95.1% against 95.0% in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Burkina Faso and Nepal?
0.1%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Nepal?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Nepal rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Burkina Faso ranks 165th and Nepal ranks 166th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/burkina-faso/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/burkina-faso/nepal/">Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.