China vs North Korea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

China
97.6%
in 2024
North Korea
97.8%
in 2023
China rank
142nd
North Korea rank
139th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • China
  • North Korea
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 97.8% against 97.6% in China, a difference of 0.2%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Korea ahead.

China ranks 142nd and North Korea ranks 139th of 188 countries.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China North Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 98.6% 99.8% 1.2% North Korea
2010s 98.1% 98.4% 0.4% North Korea
2020s 97.7% 97.8% 0.1% North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, China or North Korea?
North Korea, at 97.8% against 97.6% in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between China and North Korea?
0.2%, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and North Korea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do China and North Korea rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
China ranks 142nd and North Korea ranks 139th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs North Korea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/china/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/china/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">China vs North Korea: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.