Dominican Republic vs Naoero: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population

Dominican Republic
98.3%
in 2024
Naoero
98.4%
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
133rd
Naoero rank
130th

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Naoero
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 98.4% against 98.3% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 133rd and Naoero ranks 130th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 98.5% 98.3% 0.2% Dominican Republic
2010s 98.4% 98.4% 0.1% Dominican Republic
2020s 98.4% 98.4% 0.0% Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population, Dominican Republic or Naoero?
Naoero, at 98.4% against 98.3% in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population between Dominican Republic and Naoero?
0.1%, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Naoero?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Naoero rank globally for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Dominican Republic ranks 133rd and Naoero ranks 130th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Naoero: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/dominican-republic/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/dominican-republic/naoero/">Dominican Republic vs Naoero: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.